Skip to main content
 

SGIA47515: Participatory Approaches to Peace and Development

It is possible that changes to modules or programmes might need to be made during the academic year, in response to the impact of Covid-19 and/or any further changes in public health advice.

Type Tied
Level 4
Credits 15
Availability Not available in 2023/24
Module Cap None.
Location Durham
Department Government and International Affairs

Prerequisites

  • None.

Corequisites

  • None.

Excluded Combinations of Modules

  • None.

Aims

  • To understand and critically challenge the concept of participation in peacebuilding research
  • To understand and critically challenge the concept of participation in peacebuilding practice
  • To develop knowledge about the different ways and stages in which participation can occur in peacebuilding contexts
  • To critically analyse the impact of participatory approaches on both the researcher / practitioner and the recipient society or community
  • To develop an ability to critically reflect on the ethics of (non-)participation in peacebuilding contexts

Content

  • This module investigates the recent trend of peacebuilding missions to include local stakeholders and the recipient societies in the different stages of the peacebuilding operation. A similar trend is affecting peacebuilding research, which is becoming increasingly participatory in nature.
  • The module addresses the question of participation in the practice and research of peacebuilding. It will encourage reflection on the notion of inclusion, that is, on the question of which actors need to be included in any participatory project. This includes questions such as Who is local?, What makes a legitimate contribution to peacebuilding? and Which voices should (not) be excluded?
  • Based on an actor analysis, the module will highlight the question of power and exclusion, which form the basis of the critique of participatory projects. It will critically investigate the different stages and degrees of participation in projects related to peacebuilding. The module will provide a platform on which students can reflect on the methods and ethics of participation in the context of peacebuilding (in both its practice and research).
  • Empirically, the module is based on case studies of projects in which participation has been used.

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:

  • Students will have, by the end of the module,
  • To identify and understand the power relations inherent in participatory approaches to peacebuilding in research and practice
  • To understand and develop methods through which participation in peacebuilding can be facilitated
  • To develop a critical awareness of the power relations inherent in participatory approaches.

Subject-specific Skills:

  • Students will, by the end of the module,
  • To identify and analyse case studies in which participatory approaches have been used
  • To develop an ability to assess the legitimacy and effectiveness of participatory approaches to peacebuilding
  • To develop the ability to design participatory approaches through critical reflection
  • To engage in research projects at MSc level in the subject of peacebuilding.

Key Skills:

  • Students will be able, by the end of the module,
  • To prepare case studies for both oral and written presentation from different sources of material
  • To demonstrate an independent approach to learning, thinking (self-)critically and creatively, and problem-solving.
  • To use sophisticated techniques of information retrieval and management using an array of print and digital resources.
  • To formulate complex arguments in articulate and structured English in an effective way, within the discursive conventions and genres of academic writing and written to high academic standards.

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

  • The module will be delivered as a block in workshop format over a period of two full consecutive days, and will involve a mixture of lectures, short presentations, discussion and small group work, as well as oral presentations based on real or constructed cases.
  • Summative assessment will include an article review (pre-workshop) and a funding application to an imaginary donor (post-workshop). Which case study for the essay is selected is in the hands of students, so as to maximise flexibility with a view to the wide range of professional backgrounds and needs students attending the course are expected to have. The guiding questions for the funding application are based on the themes discussed during the workshop. The article review is designed to provide students with a focused task to prepare them, through self-guided learning, for the workshops discussions as well as case study analysis.
  • Assessment is intended to develop students' analytical and academic writing skills. Students will receive continuing formative feedback in seminar and group discussions. They will receive formal formative feedback on their presentations through the group tasks following the presentations.
  • Formative assessment is to prepare a one-page summary of the key aspects students would like to propose in the funding bid (including, for instance, categories such as project context, rationale, relevant literature, project methodology). The students will have the opportunity to work towards this assignment during the course of the module. Feedback on this task will be given in one-to-one sessions during the small-group break-out sessions during the module so the students benefit from the presence of the practitioner who can give useful input as far as the practicalities of their personal proposal are concerned. The module convener will feed forward on the theoretical aspects of the proposal.

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

ActivityNumberFrequencyDurationTotalMonitored
Workshop1Epiphany term2 days15Yes
Preparation and Reading135 
Total150 

Summative Assessment

Component: ReviewComponent Weighting: 30%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Article Review 1000100 
Component: Essay Component Weighting: 70%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Funding application to an imaginary donor2500100 

Formative Assessment

Preparation of a one A4 page summary of key aspects to propose in the funding bid.

More information

If you have a question about Durham's modular degree programmes, please visit our Help page. If you have a question about modular programmes that is not covered by the Help page, or a query about the on-line Postgraduate Module Handbook, please contact us.

Prospective Students: If you have a query about a specific module or degree programme, please Ask Us.

Current Students: Please contact your department.