TEIs undertake a single process for reflecting holistically on its provision which covers both the quality assurance requirements for Durham and the National Ministry Team. This process is undertaken approximately every 6 years and is known as ‘Periodic External Review’ or ‘PER’. The review is carried out by a joint review team made up of Durham University reviewers and National Ministry Team appointed reviewers.
For the National Ministry Team, the aims of Periodic External Review are:
a) to assess an institution’s fitness for purpose in training for nationally authorised ministries – for the Church of England the focus is on ministries licensed under canon – and delivering its other educational and formational activity;
b) to engage with and comment on the institution’s culture and practice of self-evaluation;
c) to commend examples of good practice; and
d) to make recommendations to enhance its life and work.
For the University, the aims of Periodic External Review are:
e) to undertake a detailed review of the academic quality and standards of the TEI’s educational provision;
f) to test the effectiveness of the TEI’s policies and processes for assuring quality and standards, and enhancing the learning opportunities provided to students;
g) to inform decision making on the renewal of the Common Awards partnerships with TEIs;
h) to commend areas of good practice;
i) and to make recommendations for addressing any matters identified by the Durham review team;
j) as result of this consideration, the Durham University review team will make a recommendation as to whether the TEIs programmes should be revalidated for a period of six years, with effect from the September following the Periodic External Review. The Durham University review team may recommend that the programme(s) be revalidated for a period less than six years, if significant concerns are raised as part of the review process.
The PER process is not concerned with renewing the partnerships between the University and each TEI. All Common Awards partnerships are considered for renewal towards the end of the current validation period; PER reports will be reviewed as part of the partnership renewal process.
PER reports are considered by the Quality and Standards Committee for the purpose of approving programme revalidation and the Common Awards Management Board for the purpose of identify and sharing good practice. The Quality and Formation Panel oversees the PER process for the Church of England.
The PER visit will typically consist of the following:
All TEIs have undergone the PER process for the Initial Validation period. Published reports can be found on the Church of England website.
Good practice shared by individual TEIs or identified through the PER process is considered at the Common Awards Management Board and documented on our Good Practice page.